Numerous researches over the last decades have been devoted to the study of errors and irrationalitiesin the field of human reasoning. To explain irationality and errors in performance on cognitive tasks, the researchers proposed the dual-process theory of thinking, where the Type 1 processing is characterized as intuitive and heuristic and the Type 2 processing is deliberative and analytic. In recent years, more and more researchers are investigatingthe relationship between analyticthinking and different areas intrinsically important to people. Their results imply that individual differences in analytic thinking are a significant predictor of key psychological outcomes in diverse areas of everyday life. The aim of the present study was to examine the correlation between cognitive reflection, analytical thinking, and various pseudoscientific beliefs (religious, paranormal and belief in conspiracy theories) and uncritical thinking (student anti-intellectualism and dogmatism) on a sample of psychology students. The sample group included 139 participants - 120 students of the Faculty of humanities and social sciences in Rijeka, aged from19 to 31 and 19 students of the Faculty of humanities and social sciences in Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina, aged from 20 to 23. The results have shown that cognitive reflection is not correlated and does not predict pseudoscientific beliefs and uncritical thinking. Self-report measures of analytical thinking (actively open-minded thinking and need for cognition) show negativecorrelation with pseudoscientific beliefs and uncritical thinking. Moreover, higher actively open-minded thinking and need for cognition are significant predictorsof lower pseudoscientific beliefs and uncritical thinking.