prikaz prve stranice dokumenta I Was Right!
  Download
PDF 237.98 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
I Was Right!
Prolegomena : Časopis za filozofiju, 18 (2019), 2; 209-225. https://doi.org/10.26362/20190110
Berčić, Boran

Cite this document

Berčić, B. (2019). I Was Right!. Prolegomena : Časopis za filozofiju, 18. (2), 209-225. doi: 10.26362/20190110

Berčić, Boran. "I Was Right!." Prolegomena : Časopis za filozofiju, vol. 18, no. 2, 2019, pp. 209-225. https://doi.org/10.26362/20190110

Berčić, Boran. "I Was Right!." Prolegomena : Časopis za filozofiju 18, no. 2 (2019): 209-225. https://doi.org/10.26362/20190110

Berčić, B. (2019) 'I Was Right!', Prolegomena : Časopis za filozofiju, 18(2), pp. 209-225. doi: 10.26362/20190110

Berčić B. I Was Right!. Prolegomena : Časopis za filozofiju [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 July 12];18(2):209-225. doi: 10.26362/20190110

B. Berčić, "I Was Right!", Prolegomena : Časopis za filozofiju, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 209-225, 2019. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:186:838438. [Accessed: 12 July 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)I Was Right!
AuthorBoran Berčić
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philosophy
Abstract (english)
In this article author discusses the problem of the future contingents. He wants to show that the same problem holds for a number of related cases like decisions, promises, beginnings, birth dates, moral luck, post-mortal harms, etc. The focus of the article is on the question of when and how statements about the future acquire their truth values. Author argues that truth is a relational property that statements acquire when the events that they talk about occur. For this reason, the meanings of statements like I was right! or I knew! should not be taken at their face value but rather reinterpreted according to the proposed theory. Also, several other accounts are criticised and rejected: causal determinism, thin red line, eternalism and realism about the future.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleProlegomena : Časopis za filozofiju
Numberingvol. 18, no. 2, pp. 209-225
p-ISSN1333-4395
e-ISSN1846-0593
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.26362/20190110
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:186:838438
Publication2019
Document URLhttps://hrcak.srce.hr/237870
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2020-05-15 11:20:24