prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Public Reason, Expertise and the Transformative Power of Deliberation: A Reply to My Critics
  Download
PDF 316.42 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Public Reason, Expertise and the Transformative Power of Deliberation: A Reply to My Critics
Etica & politica = Ethics and politics, 23 (2021), 1; 415-438. urn:nbn:hr:186:341281
Cerovac, Ivan

Cite this document

Cerovac, I. (2021). Public Reason, Expertise and the Transformative Power of Deliberation: A Reply to My Critics. Etica & politica = Ethics and politics, 23. (1), 415-438. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:186:341281

Cerovac, Ivan. "Public Reason, Expertise and the Transformative Power of Deliberation: A Reply to My Critics." Etica & politica = Ethics and politics, vol. 23, no. 1, 2021, pp. 415-438. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:186:341281

Cerovac, Ivan. "Public Reason, Expertise and the Transformative Power of Deliberation: A Reply to My Critics." Etica & politica = Ethics and politics 23, no. 1 (2021): 415-438. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:186:341281

Cerovac, I. (2021) 'Public Reason, Expertise and the Transformative Power of Deliberation: A Reply to My Critics', Etica & politica = Ethics and politics, 23(1), pp. 415-438. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:186:341281 (Accessed 07 May 2024)

Cerovac I. Public Reason, Expertise and the Transformative Power of Deliberation: A Reply to My Critics. Etica & politica = Ethics and politics [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 May 07];23(1):415-438. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:186:341281

I. Cerovac, "Public Reason, Expertise and the Transformative Power of Deliberation: A Reply to My Critics", Etica & politica = Ethics and politics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 415-438, 2021. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:186:341281. [Accessed: 07 May 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Public Reason, Expertise and the Transformative Power of Deliberation: A Reply to My Critics
AuthorIvan Cerovac
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philosophy
Abstract (english)
This paper presents a unified response to the critics of my book Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy. The discussion focuses on three important issues. First, I discuss advantages of a procedural (rather than substantive) interpretation of Rawls' public reason as the basis for my account of epistemic democracy. Second, I elaborate on the proper role of experts (moral and technical) in democratic decision-making and decision-authorization processes, thus sketching how controversial conclusions of science can enter public deliberation and represent valid reasons for ordinary laws and policies (those that do not address constitutional essentials and matters of basic justice). Third, I focus on the transformative effect that public deliberation can (and should) have on citizens' political participation, thereby addressing some challenges to the sustainability of epistemic democracy.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleEtica & politica = Ethics and politics
Numberingvol. 23, no. 1, pp. 415-438
p-ISSN1825-5167
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:186:341281
Publication2021
ProjectNumber: IP-2018-01-3518
Title (croatian): Odgovori na antisocijalne osobnosti u demokratskom društvu
Acronym: RAD
Leader: Luca Malatesti
Jurisdiction: Croatia
Funding stream: IP
Document URLhttp://bib.irb.hr/1131522
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) icon
Created on2022-12-20 09:33:20