Abstract | Ovaj rad fokusiran je na istraživanje koncepta pravednosti i jednakosti, njihovu teorijsku pozadinu i praktičnu primjenu. Kroz analizu diskurzivne konstrukcije ključnih pojmova kao što su znanje, moć, sloboda i politika povezuju se teorije autora: Ernesta Laclaua i Chantal Mouffe i njihove koncepcije artikulacije kao radikalno demokratskog alata preuzimanja kontrole nad odnosima hegemonije, Jacquesa Rancière i njegove teorije o nesuglasnosti kao osnovi za istinsku demokraciju te Elizabeth Anderson i njenih radova o epistemičkoj i distributivnoj pravednosti te analizi vrsta egalitarizama. Kombiniranjem svih ovih pristupa, otvara se prostor za postavljanjem artikulacije kao sredstva za osvještavanje nemogućnosti univerzalnog i primjene pluralističke vizije proizvodnje znanja i lokalno situiranih diskursa. Pritom se mora ići u samu srž stvaranja znanja, odnosno u društveno pojmljivo i nepojmljivo te u kontingentnu prirodu koncepata oko kojih su izgrađene društvene strukture. Primjeri iz prakse javljaju se još u starim američkim zajednicama koje su živjele u raznovrsnim oblicima društvene organizacije i dostupnih imaginarija, na što ukazuju David Wengrow i David Graeber. Iz toga slijedi da izazivanjem ukorijenjenih narativa i propitkivanjem stabilnosti imaginarija, moguće je osloboditi put ka mišljenju novog društvenog. Iako što će Branko Milanovic pokazati da je gotovo nemoguće udaljiti se od kapitalističkog načina proizvodnje, koji je svakako zaslužan za ogromne probleme u distribuciji resursa i političkoj koncepciji pravednog, njegovi mehanizmi mogu se i upotrijebiti u svrhu ustanovljivanja efikasnijih mikrodruštvenih praksi koje su jednake i pravedne. Tako se u primjerima recipročnog rada, mutualističkih zajednica i samoorganizacije očituje snaga koju društveni i politički subjekti posjeduju i kontinuirano koriste kako bi društveno proizvedene nejednakosti umanjili i uspostavili dostojanstvene živote. Dakle, tržišni mehanizam kapitalizma i dalje je na djelu, ali borbe i alternativne prakse pokazuju da se jednakost uvijek pojavi na neki način, polazeći od samih članova društva koji pokažu što je njima u tom trenutku i okolnostima zapravo jednako i pravedno. Zato je poststrukturalistička ideja uvažavanja pluralnosti identiteta i borbi te društvenih stvarnosti veoma korisna u ilustriranju prednosti ostvarivanja partikularnih zahtjeva nad univerzalnim. |
Abstract (english) | This work is focused on researching the concepts of justice and equality, their theoretical background and practical application. Through the analysis of the discursive construction of key concepts such as knowledge, power, freedom and politics, the theories of the following authors are connected: Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe and their conception of articulation as a radical democratic tool for taking control over hegemonic relations, Jacques Rancière and his theory of disagreement as a basis for real democracy and Elizabeth Anderson and her works on epistemic and distributive justice and the analysis of types of egalitarianism. By combining all these approaches, a space is opened for setting up articulation to raise awareness of the impossibility of universality - and for an application of a pluralistic vision of knowledge production and locally situated discourses. In doing so, one must go to the very core of the creation of knowledge, that is, to the socially intelligible and unintelligible, and to the contingent nature of the concepts around which social structures are built. Examples from practice appear even in old American communities that lived in various forms of social organization and available imaginaries, as pointed out by David Wengrow and David Graeber. It follows that by challenging entrenched narratives and questioning the stability of the imaginary, it is possible to free the way to the thinking of the new sociality. Although Branko Milanovic will show that it is almost impossible to move away from the capitalist mode of production, which is certainly responsible for enormous problems in the distribution of resources and the political conception of justice, its mechanisms can be used for the purpose of establishing more efficient micro-social practices that are equal and just. Thus, in the examples of reciprocal work, mutualistic communities and self-organization, the power that social and political subjects possess and continuously use to reduce socially produced inequalities and establish dignified lives is manifested. Even so, the market mechanism of capitalism is still at work, but the struggles and alternative practices show that equality always appears in some way, starting from the members of society themselves who show what is equal and just for them at that moment and in concrete circumstances. That is why the post-structuralist idea of respecting the plurality of identities, struggles and social realities is very useful in illustrating the advantages of realizing particular demands over universal ones. |